Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable
On Sat 2007-12-29 11:27:34 -0500, Florent Fourcot wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
>>
>> armel is not an officially supported architecture yet, so it has its
>> own archive server.
>
> Yes I know, and there is not mirror with 2.6.23 for armel ? I was
> surprised by the answer of Daniel.
Ah, sorry about that, Florent. I missed that you were specifically
asking about armel, even though it was in the text i quoted and
replied to. That was dumb of me.
I am indeed using plain ol' stock debian arm on igor here, *not*
armel. I apologize for any confusion.
--dkg
Attachment:
pgpKUtbEUrMHh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: "it@server-support.org" <it@server-support.org>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: John Winters <john@sinodun.org.uk>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: John Winters <john@sinodun.org.uk>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg-debian.org@fifthhorseman.net>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>