Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
* Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr> [2007-12-29 17:27]:
> > armel is not an officially supported architecture yet, so it has its
> > own archive server.
> Yes I know, and there is not mirror with 2.6.23 for armel ? I was
> surprised by the answer of Daniel.
Quoting Riku Voipio from #455909:
> > Riku, any idea why linux-2.6 2.6.23-2 hasn't been built for armel
> > yet?
>
> #425971, thus, linux-2.6 needs to be built by hand. I expected manoj
> to upload a new kernel-package this month so I didn't initially
> bother with 2.6.23-2. I Will start a build now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: John Winters <john@sinodun.org.uk>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: John Winters <john@sinodun.org.uk>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg-debian.org@fifthhorseman.net>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Linux 2.6.23 in debian unstable [was: Re: Thecus 2100, extremly slow r8169]
- From: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>