Re: installing on RiscPC
>> 1. Any changes should be forwarded to the original author for inclusion
>> in a later release of the tools.
>No problem, since it's "should", not "must".
I'm not convinced that this distinction is really meaningful.
>This translates to "you mustn't modify the part of the source code
>that prints 'RMK rulez'". That could be in conflict with the DFSG if
Yes, in my view this definitely makes the code non-free. If we can't get the
terms of the licence changed I don't think we should distribute it.