Re: installing on RiscPC

[Phil Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>]

>> 1. Any changes should be forwarded to the original author for inclusion
>>    in a later release of the tools.
>
>No problem, since it's "should", not "must".

I'm not convinced that this distinction is really meaningful.

>This translates to "you mustn't modify the part of the source code
>that prints 'RMK rulez'". That could be in conflict with the DFSG if
>you're picky

Yes, in my view this definitely makes the code non-free.  If we can't get the 
terms of the licence changed I don't think we should distribute it.

p.