Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

[Chris Gorman <chris@cgnet.cx>]

On my way to report a gcc bug report to bugs.debian.org, what do I find in
my inbox.... ;^)  

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that gcc 2.95.2-13 is dodgy? If so, which version would
> I be advised to use?
>
I think you may be correct (at least on arm).  If you are successfull with
Phil's suggestion (building srpm gcc) post a report to the list.  (I for
one would like to get an update on this.)  

Unfortunatly, my error is not the same as yours.   While building the
potato sendmail package, I get the following ...

cc -O2 -I. -I/usr/include/db2 -DNEWDB -DNIS -DMAP_REGEX -DHASFLOCK=1
-DTCPWRAPPE
RS=1 -D_FFR_MAX_MIME_HEADER_LENGTH=1 -D_FFR_MAX_HEADERS_LENGTH=1
-D_PATH_SENDMAI
LCF=\"/etc/mail/sendmail.cf\" -include ../../debian/el33t.h
-DCMDDIR=\"/usr/lib/
sm.bin\" -DPATH=\"/usr/bin:/bin\" -D_PATH_SENDMAIL=\"/usr/sbin/sendmail\"
-c -
o domain.o domain.c
domain.c: In function `getmxrr':
domain.c:380: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
(insn 1818 1817 319 (set (reg:SI 4 r4)
        (umin:SI (reg/v:SI 4 r4)
            (const_int 8192 [0x2000]))) -1 (nil)
    (nil))
make[2]: *** [domain.o] Error 1

A bug report has been submitted to gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl on this
error.  Good luck with your bug.

> 
> Nicholas Clark
> 

Chris Gorman