Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

To: Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>
Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
From: Philip Blundell <pb@tazenda.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:31:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E13T4On-0007Hm-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
In-reply-to: Message from Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> of "Sun, 27 Aug 2000 15:53:07 BST." <[🔎] 20000827155307.A95230@plum.flirble.org>
References: <[🔎] 20000827155307.A95230@plum.flirble.org>

>Am I right in thinking that gcc 2.95.2-13 is dodgy? If so, which version would
>I be advised to use?

I'm not sure about the details of 2.95.2-13.  But the recommended version is 
the SRPM you can get from Scott's web page - go to www.netwinder.org and 
follow the links for tools.

p.

Reply to:

References:
- gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
  - From: Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>

Prev by Date: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
Next by Date: Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
Previous by thread: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
Next by thread: Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread