Re: 1.3.26 coming soon?
* Kjetil Kjernsmo (kjetil@kjernsmo.net) wrote :
> Hi!
>
> Since nobody shouted at Clint, I'll try another question... :-)
>
> On Tuesday 25 June 2002 18:46, Andrew Shugg wrote:
>
> > However I'm not quite clear on the procedure for these packages
> > entering the woody distribution (the testing pool) during the freeze.
> > I'm aware of the changes happening to allow the security team to
> > make updates, and as I understand the 1.3.26 packages have already
> > been uploaded to the unstable pool. I don't see the 1.3.26 packages
> > in the testing excuses page, though:
>
> I was wondering, how does the 1.3.26 packages in unstable differ from
> those in woody?
>
> Last night, I got the woody packages installed, but since I have
> unstable sources in my sources.list (and APT::Default-Release
> "testing";), apt told me to upgrade to 1.3.26-1 in unstable (not that I
> really understand why, but never mind), so I did...
>
They differ in that the version number in unstable is higher than that in
woody ;-)
Cheers,
-Thom
--
Thom May -> thom@debian.org
"Whatever happended to the HP-UX and Irix versions of IE? Does anyone
use them?"
"Yeah, but only people whose lovers shop at Wanda's Whip Emporium."
--seen on /.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: