[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ndiswrapper and sound - etch



On Tuesday 30 May 2006 8:37 pm, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Does the kernel (via dmesg or kern.log) report any errors? Unknown codec
> does sound like a problem. It's most likely a driver issue and not
> something you can fix except by upgrading ALSA.

some clues there.
kern.log:
May 30 06:26:53 slt kernel: input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input2
May 30 06:26:53 slt kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.5[B] -> Link [LNKB] 
-
> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10

dmesg:
MC'97 0 converters and GPIO not ready (0x1)
input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input2
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.5[B] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> 
IRQ 10

From lshw id 14.5 is the sound card:
*-multimedia
             description: Multimedia audio controller
             product: IXP SB400 AC'97 Audio Controller
             vendor: ATI Technologies Inc
             physical id: 14.5
             bus info: pci@00:14.5
             version: 02
             width: 32 bits
             clock: 66MHz
             capabilities: bus_master cap_list
             configuration: driver=ATI IXP AC97 controller
             resources: iomemory:c0003400-c00034ff irq:10

I notice from these same three locations (dmesg, kern.log and lshw) that 
ndiswrapper is also using irq:10. Maybe its the (very old) DOS memories, but 
could that be causing the problem?

I noted the entry in the dmesg output saying "If a device doesn't work, try 
"pci=routeirq". " That raises two questions: (1) would this apply to my 
situation? and (2) is that a kernel param similar to noapic?

> Which kernel do you have?

I have 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic

> > Just an aside, another person responded by saying to "use udev, that
> > should take care of the devices." As far as I can see, udev is being
> > used, but I don't know enough about udev to know how I can correct this
> > problem.
>
> udev creates the relevant entries in /dev/snd, but it won't be the cause
> here.

That helps. Thanks.

Scott



Reply to: