Re: Openoffice 2.0.1
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
> Mickael Marchand wrote:
>
>>wow, what a surprise !
>>
>>I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and
>>_works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;)
>
>
> I find your lack of faith disturbing, Lord Marchand. ;-)
well, the only thing I heard about having a native OOo on 64 bits was :
"it' s just a dream, stop thinking about it" for months ;)
so I am really amazed, it seems you did a really good job :)
> In fact, I have been struggling with these bugs since one month and I
> fixed some of them first on the 2.0.0 (which was a bit pointless) but
> since I'm working on the 2.0.1, I really had hope to finish.
I did not know someone was working hard on this problem actually ;)
well, I haven't seen any bugs yet so it looks like a really good job,
I did not even expected it to fire up when I started the build :) (hence
my surprise :o)
(well, I am not a big OOo user, just basic usage ;)
>
> The patch attached to my previous mail is in the pipe to be included in
> the future 2.0.1 Debian package (I've discussed with the Debian
> maintainers of the OpenOffice packages). So, when the 2.0.1 will hit the
> road it won't be necessary to apply the patch again.
>
> Another thing !
>
> I would suggest to report bugs directly to Openoffice.org, NOT to the
> Debian maintainers. They might be NUMEROUS ones and the Debian
> maintainers are already over-loaded, so it would help to report it
> directly to the source.
>
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html
Yes, that makes sense.
>
>
>>I am currently uploading the packages I've built to a faster server
>>(ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/) so other people can test
>>and confirm I am not going crazy or doing some mistake :)
>
>
> Great ! Actually, I don't have a lot of time to maintain such
> repository. Thanks a lot.
well, I can rebuild and host these packages without trouble as long as
it's needed. It's no problem for me.
thanks again :)
Cheers,
Mik
>
>
>>you will need to install gcj-4.1 from experimental to be able to get
>>these packages (or maybe it was gcc-4.1, I have both ...)
>
>
> Ok. No problem.
>
>
>>thanks Emmanuel for the tip ;)
>
>
> You're more than welcome. ;-)
>
>
>>btw, I did not got your error Emmanuel, it just built fine, maybe you
>>had an incomplete build laying around before ?
>
>
> Hmmmm, it must be me... I'm such a stupid git sometimes. :-/
>
> Regards
Reply to: