Re: RAID
On 11/12/05, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Even on a fileserver it is becoming hard to have your network link
> > outperform your disk IO unless you have a very good gigabit or better
> > network link. Any single modern disk can saturate a 100Mbit link.
> This is not always true. If you have a lot of seeks (e.g., because
> people are accessing hundreds of large files simultaneously) disks start
> to become a bottleneck.
In that case you really should be distributing your data over more
places. For my networks, I perfer to use NA Storage to keep most of
the I/O load off the CPU - plus I can then have many servers point to
one drive without big hairy networking problems.
Do I have a network like this? No... but that's the network I'm about
to build for my devgroup. So, all that I just said is in theory -
feel free to let the heavy hammer of experience drop straight down on
me, since I probably need it.
Oh, and this thread is - by now - officially Off-Topic. If someone
really doesn't like all this OT traffic, tell me to shut up and I
will. But until then I'm assuming that no-one really minds this
*that* much.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RAID
- From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
- Re: RAID
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: RAID
- From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
- Re: RAID
- From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>
- Re: RAID
- From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>
- Re: RAID
- From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: RAID
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>