Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
David Wood <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Getting the toolchain adapted is more important than some trivial mv
>> commands for libs.
> You're right, of course, but I don't understand why we should avoid
> doing them. With the new dirs in place and linked from the old
> locations, package conversion can start. Until then, the process waits
> to start. Why wait?
We shouldn't. We just have to test this very carefully or the fallout
of a bad upload will create too much oposition to including multiarch
patches and slow us down overall.
Imaging the bad blood you would create if you break libc6.