[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: poor gcc-4.0 performance



BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          1772.9  :      45.47  :      14.93
STRING SORT         :          167.69  :      74.93  :      11.60
BITFIELD            :      4.0331e+08  :      69.18  :      14.45
FP EMULATION        :          136.48  :      65.49  :      15.11
FOURIER             :           16345  :      18.59  :      10.44
ASSIGNMENT          :          19.666  :      74.83  :      19.41
IDEA                :          3409.2  :      52.14  :      15.48
HUFFMAN             :          1412.1  :      39.16  :      12.50
NEURAL NET          :          26.337  :      42.31  :      17.80
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          974.56  :      50.49  :      36.46
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK
RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 58.548
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 34.114
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA
BELOW===============================
CPU                 : AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ 1872MHz
L2 Cache            : 512 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
C compiler          : gcc version 3.4.5 20050605 (prerelease) (Debian
3.4.4-0)
libc                : ld-2.3.2.so
MEMORY INDEX        : 14.817
INTEGER INDEX       : 14.457
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 18.921
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.


-------------------



BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :           924.8  :      23.72  :       7.79
STRING SORT         :          163.04  :      72.85  :      11.28
BITFIELD            :      4.4579e+08  :      76.47  :      15.97
FP EMULATION        :          144.52  :      69.35  :      16.00
FOURIER             :           16233  :      18.46  :      10.37
ASSIGNMENT          :           17.86  :      67.96  :      17.63
IDEA                :          4334.3  :      66.29  :      19.68
HUFFMAN             :          1289.7  :      35.76  :      11.42
NEURAL NET          :          29.565  :      47.49  :      19.98
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          1013.5  :      52.51  :      37.91
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK
RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 54.758
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 35.839
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA
BELOW===============================
CPU                 : AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ 1872MHz
L2 Cache            : 512 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
C compiler          : gcc-4.0
libc                : ld-2.3.2.so
MEMORY INDEX        : 14.697
INTEGER INDEX       : 12.938
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 19.878
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

As you see some results are better while running nbench compiled with
gcc-4.0 and some are not.
-- 
Registered Linux User 369908
alterfenix@jabberpl.org



Reply to: