[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SATA No partitionable media were found



Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 17:10 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:23:49PM +0200, Susanne Wenz wrote:
> > I've got a new machine with K8S-MX board and SATA Samsung SP1614C and 
tried to 
> > install it with sarge-amd64-netinst.iso, sarge-i386-1.iso and 
> > sid-amd64-monolitic.iso, but all images stopped because "No partitionable 
> > media were found".
> > 
> > I see that there is a package sata-modules-2.4.27-2-386-di. Does a 
CD-Image 
> > exist which contains that package? Or does anybody know a different way to 
> > get debian running on this machine?
> > 
> > I saw some similar problems but I couldn't find a solution oder didn't 
> > understand it.
> 
> It is probably not possible to run that chipset with sata using 2.4
> kernels at all.  You may even need a very recent 2.6 kernel to get
> support.  Many people have had problems with sata module
> loading/detection with 2.6.8 while 2.6.10/2.6.11 are doing much better.
> 
> You could try 'modprobe sata_sis' from console 2 during the install to
> see if that module exists and if so if it detects anything.  Do it from
> a 2.6 install (linux26 at boot: prompt on sarge i386 installs, just
> normal on amd64 install since it only uses 2.6 kernels).
> 
> I have only tried nvidia, via and sil3112 sata controllers myself, and
> so far no problems.  The via (A8V-Deluxe) detected perfectly with the
> debian-pure64 sarge net install cd from a few weeks ago.
> 
> Len Sorensen

I went to 
http://debian.inode.at/debian-amd64/debian-installer/2005-04-24/monolithic 
and took the mini.iso. I went through the installation to the point where "No 
partitionable media were found", did 'modprobe sata_sis' from console 2. 
After that sata_sis and libata were loaded, but the error still remains. 
uname -a says: Linux debian 2.6.8-10-amd64-generic #1 Fri Jan 28 04:09:34 CET 
2005 x86_64 unkonwn.

Are there any ideas? Thanks.

Susanne Wenz



Reply to: