[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FW: anybody help me? dependency problem: no way back???



Eric Cranley <ericc@Willis-Music.com> writes:

> You are my savior. Thank you. Now before I continue with the upgrade I
> should have done two months ago, are there any other major package conflicts
> I should be aware of? I installed the system as sid in the first week of
> December. I pinned the system to testing last week, and this morning's
> problem was the first upgrade I tried. Here's what apt-get upgrade wants to
> do:
>
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   apache apache-common apache-utils apt-utils console-common console-data
>   console-tools cpio dash dialog discover1 discover1-data dselect exim4
>   exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light gettext-base grub initrd-tools
>   initscripts libconsole libcupsys2-gnutls10 libdb3 libdb4.2 libdbi-perl
>   libdiscover1 libgc1 libgcc1 libkrb53 libltdl3 libmysqlclient12
>   libsigc++-1.2-5c102 login mailx mdadm module-init-tools modutils
>   mysql-client mysql-common mysql-server netbase passwd perl perl-base
>   perl-modules php4 rdate samba samba-common sysv-rc sysvinit webmin
>   webmin-inetd webmin-samba
> The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
>   e2fslibs e2fsprogs libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libcomerr2
>   libgcrypt11 libgnutls11 liblzo1 libreadline4 libss2 libtasn1-2 libuuid1
>   mount procps util-linux zlib1g
> 55 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 18 downgraded, 0 to remove and 1 not
> upgraded.
>
> Is there anything I should really becareful of or install in a specific
> order?
> Thanks again for your help.

Nothing I'm aware of or as catastrophic as the libc6/base-files
problem that basically kills the system. Please note that I'm running
sid on my main system with sarge chroots for tests and buildd though.

If something doesn't work you can always go back to the sid versions
(lower the pin below 1000 then).

MfG
        Goswin

PS: Sarge needs users to find any remaining problems. The more the
better. So thanks for doing it.



Reply to: