[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anyone using gcc-3.4 port for audio work?



|--==> Norval Watson writes:

  NW> Hi Daniel,
  NW> I have setup dual-boot system with pure64/sid and AGNULA/Demudi
  NW> 1.2.1-rc1_i386.
  NW> I am using pure64 as everyday desktop and Demudi for sound.
  NW> I hope to add all the Demudi packages to 64 side so I can have a 64-bit
  NW> Demudi.
  NW> I think most pkgs are available in pure64 but some, eg Virtual Keyboard,
  NW> are not.

I think the main problem here is that some  A/DeMuDi packages have not
been uploaded  to Debian  and thus the   auto-builders did not compile
them on different architectures (amd64 in this case).

My application as Debian maintainer has been approved, but I'm waiting
for the  actual account. After  I  get it I'll be  able  to upload the
missing  packages.  In the  meantime,  anyone willing  to  sponsor the
upload? :)

It would be great to make debian/demudi running on amd64.

Cheers,

Free

  NW> My limited understanding of kernel issues is that the kernel should be
  NW> compiled with realtime-lsm module, I don't know if anyone can do this.
  NW> I am very much a newcomer to all this but I'm happy to help out where I
  NW> can.
  NW> I had problems starting jackd in pure64 initially but now I can, don't
  NW> ask me why...
  NW> Regards,
  NW> Norv


  NW> On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 15:10 +0000, Daniel James wrote:
  >>Hello all,
  >>
  >>I mostly run audio applications on various Linux boxes and have an 
  >>Opteron 240 based machine which I'd like to try Debian on. There are 
  >>existing distributions for audio use (eg AGNULA/DeMuDi) and there are 
  >>pure 64-bit distributions of course, but as far as I am aware no-one 
  >>has done the work to create a pure 64-bit audio distribution.
  >>
  >>What I was thinking of trying is an installation of the gcc-3.4 AMD64 
  >>port, then rebuilding any missing packages. A multimedia kernel would 
  >>be essential, as well as JACK infrastructure and various audio 
  >>applications.
  >>
  >>Does the list know of anyone working in this area already?
  >>
  >>Cheers
  >>
  >>Daniel
  >>
  >>



Reply to: