* Robert Millan (zeratul2@wanadoo.es) wrote: > So your point is that "dual namings are not that bad". Ok. Now, how is this > dual naming actualy _better_ than the former scheme: > > DEB_HOST_ARCH = "x86-64" > DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU = "x86_64" > > To my eyes, the former scheme was at least consistent. If your answer is that > for some reason "amd64" is preferable to "x86-64", how is it the same reason > does not apply to "x86_64"? amd64 is preferred for DEB_HOST_ARCH. DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU isn't something we control. This has been discussed in great detail on this list in the past. I encourage you to review the archives and threads of that discussion. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature