[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ccc install



It may be ancient, but it "works".  I tried "apt-get install ccc" and
followed the instructions, but... seeing how i could not get the exact
version number for ccc that it wanted, i dont think it installed
properly.  I renmaed the rpm to match what the script was looking for,
but then afterwards it was complaining about a lack of
/usr/doc/ccc-x.x.x .  So i figured i'd try out other ways.

Richard Fillion
rick@rhix.ods.org


On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 12:59, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Richard Fillion wrote:
> 
> >I installed ccc on my box to see if i could get better performance out
> >of some apps with it instead of gcc.  I followed these instructions :
> >
> >http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/241/2001/3/0/5451555/
> >
> This is ancient, you can now "apt-get install ccc" and follow the 
> instructions so its script installs the ccc RPM "properly".
> 
> >And ccc now runs, but i cant compile anything. 
> >
> >rick@pwsrhix:~/dev/C$ cat helloworld.c 
> >   #include <stdio.h>
> >   main(){
> >        printf("Hello World\n");
> >   }
> >rick@pwsrhix:~/dev/C$ ccc helloworld.c -o helloworld
> >cc: Severe: /usr/include/stdio.h, line 34: Cannot find file <stddef.h>
> >specified in #include directive. (noinclfilef)
> ># include <stddef.h>
> >--^
> >
> I haven't seen this problem, but YMMV.
> 
> Note that I can't get cxx to work in unstable, but that shouldn't affect 
> ccc.
> 
> Please let me know if uninstalling the aliened rpm and reinstalling via 
> the .deb works.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> 
> -Adam P.
> 
> GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
> 
> Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 
> <http://lyre.mit.edu/%7Epowell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: