Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?

To: Craig Small <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:01:23 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020313100123.GA9742@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020313095933.GB2198@eye-net.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 20020306231123.GD24515@eye-net.com.au> <[🔎] E16iui9-0005yH-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20020312214449.GA13741@eye-net.com.au> <[🔎] 20020313095933.GB2198@eye-net.com.au>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:59:33PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
>
> Someone just emailled me and said 2.4.18 has some serious problems
> with non-i386 systems, oh well, maybe 19.

If you're referring to the static binary problem, then it's already
fixed in my packages.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)

Prev by Date: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Next by Date: NFS problems from alpha server --> solaris client
Previous by thread: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Next by thread: New Alpha on the net!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread