Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:59:33 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020313095933.GB2198@eye-net.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020312214449.GA13741@eye-net.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 20020306231123.GD24515@eye-net.com.au> <[🔎] E16iui9-0005yH-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20020312214449.GA13741@eye-net.com.au>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:44:49AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> 
> I'll give 2.4.18 a goo shortly, any suggestions on wether I have more
> success with a gcc 3.0 or not?
> 
Someone just emailled me and said 2.4.18 has some serious problems
with non-i386 systems, oh well, maybe 19.

 - Craig
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>                 Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

References:
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)

Prev by Date: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Next by Date: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Previous by thread: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Next by thread: Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread