Re: '/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is not a symlink'
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Hmmm, I was afraid that you were going to say that you wouldn't be able
> to check this out. Should I wish you a speedy recovery? Not as far as
> debian/alpha is concerned, I guess :-)
Hehehehe...I'm really fine, just congested and cough alot. Earlier I had
a fever, but I'm not as bad now. Thanks, though :-)
> I just checked with dpkg --contents what's in the i386 package, and it's
> a symlink there:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 45017 1999-02-04 15:34 lib/ld-2.0.7.so
> [...]
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 1999-02-04 15:35 lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.0.7.so
Good to know (I was going to do this actually). I'll start a new build in
a few minutes and see what goes.
> BTW, good work on the glibc 2.1 front!
Thanks. It's ugly, but working VERY well. I'm recompiling the lib right
now and then I'm going to compile a new ld.so and maybe run the egcs build
once more (need to update the dependencies and replaces fields).
Expect a working set of core libs by the weekend...
C
Reply to: