[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: '/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is not a symlink'

On Wed 10 Feb 1999, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > ld-linux.so.2 is usually a symlink to ld-2.0.7.so, isn't it?
> > Chris, what's going on? This is from libc6.1 There's
> > also something there that worries me:
> Hmmm..I'll look into this.  I just saw it also (how I missed it before
> I'll never know).  I'm out sick today, so I should have a bit more time to

Hmmm, I was afraid that you were going to say that you wouldn't be able
to check this out. Should I wish you a speedy recovery? Not as far as
debian/alpha is concerned, I guess :-)

> check this out.  FYI, I built the package "as was", so it could be a
> packaging problem.  As I said, I'll check it out...

I just checked with dpkg --contents what's in the i386 package, and it's
a symlink there:

-rwxr-xr-x root/root     45017 1999-02-04 15:34 lib/ld-2.0.7.so
lrwxrwxrwx root/root         0 1999-02-04 15:35 lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.0.7.so

BTW, good work on the glibc 2.1 front!

Paul Slootman
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl | debian: paul@debian.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software,   Enschede,   the Netherlands

Reply to: