[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: '/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is not a symlink'

On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Paul Slootman wrote:

> ld-linux.so.2 is usually a symlink to ld-2.0.7.so, isn't it?
> Chris, what's going on? This is from libc6.1 There's
> also something there that worries me:

Hmmm..I'll look into this.  I just saw it also (how I missed it before
I'll never know).  I'm out sick today, so I should have a bit more time to
check this out.  FYI, I built the package "as was", so it could be a
packaging problem.  As I said, I'll check it out...

Yes, it should be a symlink....


Reply to: