Re: '/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is not a symlink'
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Paul Slootman wrote:
> ld-linux.so.2 is usually a symlink to ld-2.0.7.so, isn't it?
> Chris, what's going on? This is from libc6.1 22.214.171.12481211-2. There's
> also something there that worries me:
Hmmm..I'll look into this. I just saw it also (how I missed it before
I'll never know). I'm out sick today, so I should have a bit more time to
check this out. FYI, I built the package "as was", so it could be a
packaging problem. As I said, I'll check it out...
Yes, it should be a symlink....