Re: Working compiler?
Kristoffer.Rose@ens-lyon.fr writes:
> The proposal to simply replace `-O2' with `-O' is also interesting but
> requires a lot more testing, IMO; furthermore it should really be an alpha
> patch to the actual egcs package...
Just to be clear, I did not propose this as a permanent solution. I
am only using that because at the moment, a better solution has not
presented itself. I am concerned about the effects on g++ and the
replacement of various libraries with older versions if I go down to
the older version of egcs. So far, I haven't seen any good solution
to this.
Also, a PowerPC person informs me that there are much more recent
versions of egcs than we have here and that we ought to investigate
them. Hmm.
> I'm all for the "stable cc but experimental c++" line of things. I assume
> Christopher is working with egcs 1.0.3a?
Yes, me too. However, until we have that, I'm using -O. It at least
seems to generate valid code :-)
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Visit the Air Capital Linux Users Group on the web at http://www.aclug.org
Reply to: