Re: Working compiler?
On 9 Nov 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
> Also, a PowerPC person informs me that there are much more recent
> versions of egcs than we have here and that we ought to investigate
> them. Hmm.
Yes, we should. So far, I have been unable to find time to package up a
bleeding-edge snapshot, although the PPC people may have a source for such
since they require the newer snapshots to build packages. Supposedly,
most of our problems have been solved about a month ago or so, but
apparently weren't incorporated into the 1_1 prerelease tree that was just
uploaded to master to replace the current egcs. I'm testing it again
against jade, fyi, just in case....
C
Reply to: