Re: Working compiler?
Loic writes:
> It looks to me egcs-1.0.3a was very stable. No problem for all C programs
> I have encountered. I currently use this version, it is easy to recompile
> it from the source package in hamm (I have put the resulting packages in
> http://lhpca.univ-lyon1.fr/~lprylli/egcs)
I agree! I have been unable to do anything with the later egcs packages!
The proposal to simply replace `-O2' with `-O' is also interesting but
requires a lot more testing, IMO; furthermore it should really be an alpha
patch to the actual egcs package...
> And Christopher is working on combining a stable gcc with the need for
> libstdc++
I'm all for the "stable cc but experimental c++" line of things. I assume
Christopher is working with egcs 1.0.3a?
Cheers,
Kristoffer
--
Kristoffer Høgsbro Rose, phd, prof.associé <http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~krisrose>
addr: LIP, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 Allée d'Italie, F-69364 Lyon 7
phone: +33(0)4 7272 8642, fax +33(0)4 7272 8080 <Kristoffer.Rose@ENS-Lyon.FR>
pgp f-p: A4D3 5BD7 3EC5 7CA2 924E D21D 126B B8E0 <krisrose@{debian,tug}.org>
Reply to: