Re: gcc?
On Sunday, 28 Sep, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>
> Their plan is to have releases in addition to the weekly snapshots.
> They just haven't got to release #1 yet. I don't know if the current
> target release date has been advertised publicly (or if it's been
> changed since last I heard), so I probably shouldn't say more.
They publicly advertised their intention to do the first release
"by September".
>
> Some g++ support libraries are included with egcs now, but I think
> libg++ is mostly considered deprecated. There may be a few things it
> has that the other libraries don't, but last I heard, no one had
> expressed enough interest to pick up their maintenance.
There are quite a few things, namely, libg++ itself (apart from
libstd++): stuff like String, AllocRing etc.
> (But I'm
> *not* up to date on egcs mail, it may have happened.) So I doubt
> you'll see a libg++ fixed to work with egcs.
Oops... :-( Unless I fix it myself... Grr. Especially considering
the fact that I never write in C++. (Well, almost never.)
I hope it is easier than fixing gcc to work with libg++, though.
>
> What other problems have you seen with egcs?
Nothing else so far.
Nikita
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: gcc?
- From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@classnet.med.miami.edu>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@netg.se>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>