Re: gcc?
>You can work on pretty much anything that's not there. I'm working on a
>few things, but nothing that I've gotten heavily into yet. If you want
>also, I have a list of packages that are still in old package format that
>need to be changed over. It's a small list, but if you'd like to work on
>those, be my guest :)
It's something to start with at least, and given my current work situation
it's hard for me to do non-mechanical things, so that would probably work
out well. (I only get to be with box on weekends *sniff*. At least I
can access it via the net).
>> This gcc was no problem. Now all that's left is to put it to good use :)
>
>Hehehehe..I know. I definitely got my money's worth out of my UDB so far
>:) I've done more programming on this thing than any of my computers over
>the last 10 years :P
That sounds very promising. I haven't done anywhere near as much
programming in the past few years as I'd like.
/Anders
--
-- Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Anders Hammarquist | Mud at Kingdoms | iko@netg.se
NetGuide Scandinavia | telnet kingdoms.se 1812 | Fax: +46 31 50 79 39
http://www.netg.se | | Tel: +46 31 50 79 40
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc?
- From: Chris Chimelis <chris@classnet.med.miami.edu>
- References:
- Re: gcc?
- From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@netg.se>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Chris Chimelis <chris@classnet.med.miami.edu>