Re: gcc?
On Sunday, 28 Sep, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
>
> This gcc was no problem. Now all that's left is to put it to good use :)
>
The only problem is that gcc can't handle exceptions on Alpha. That
means that the menu package is not compilable. Fortunately, I don't
know of any other package that uses exceptions, so for most things gcc
is OK. But I really want to have working update-menus...
I tried egcs and found it very nice. It does not need any pesky patches
and is much more aware of linux-alpha (which the FSF gcc does not even
support). Although egcs is considered development version and does not
have public releases, I believe that linux-alpha support in it is way
more stable than the one in patched-gcc.
Anyway, at the moment it is better to use gcc (I can't compile libg++
with egcs, for example), but later it may be worth considering egcs as our
compiler of choice.
Cheers,
Nikita
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc?
- From: Nikhil Nair <nn201@cus.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
- References:
- Re: gcc?
- From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@classnet.med.miami.edu>
- Re: gcc?
- From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@netg.se>