[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: :( (egcs tests)



On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Nikita Schmidt wrote:

> Which version of dejagnu do you use?  Is it from ftp.cygnus.com:/pub/egcs
> or some official version?

I used the one from cygnus.  I believe it's required since they claim the
older one won't work (I guess expect has been hacked again :P).

> I attach my testsuite results for comparison:

> 		=== gcc Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		4874
> # of unexpected failures	9
> # of expected failures		5
> # of unsupported tests		7
> /usr/home/cetus/egcs-971122/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.90.18 971122 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
> --- Note that these failures are known floating point related problems,
> and Richard Henderson is said to be working on them.

I just wiped my results, but gcc turned in much more failures for me.  I
believe it might've been a misconfiguration on my part.  I've rebuilt egcs
with no options now just to test it out.

> 		=== g++ Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		3330
> # of unexpected failures	66
> # of unexpected successes	2
> # of expected failures		86
> # of untested testcases		6
> /usr/home/cetus/egcs-971122/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.18 971122 (gcc2-970802 experimental)

I didn't even pass 80 of the tests.  It's halfway through the gcc tests
now, so I'll see how it does this time.

> --- Not that bad.  Did you mean "_quite_ a few g++ tests" that worked?

No, quite a few meaning more than 50 :P

> 		=== libio Summary ===
> # of expected passes		40
> 		=== libstdc++ Summary ===
> # of expected passes		30

I passed this also before.  The libs seem to be right on :)

Chris


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: