[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: installing with the debian installer and selecting pam profiles and gdm3 not able to login using the keyboard



Hi, Well it is not once the system is installed about the numberd choices but I did also find after I did just a standard system still on low priority during the installation and after the base system is installed chrooting into the target system and running dpkg-reconfigure debconf and selecting low then leaving the chroot and going back to the installer and finishing the installation once the installation finishes and I run tasksel and select graphical desktop and other options like file and print server this same choice comes up using the dialog interface so I use space but no matter what options are selected it still won't continue. I had to reboot as removing files in /var/lock would not fix the issues and ran dpkg --configure -a and just selected unix authentication worked but not on the initial installation or the first run of tasksel after the installation. Nick Gawronski ----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Thibault" <sthibault@debian.org>
To: "Nick Gawronski" <nick@nickgawronski.com>
Cc: <debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: installing with the debian installer and selecting pam profiles and gdm3 not able to login using the keyboard


Nick Gawronski, le Wed 06 Oct 2010 09:57:40 -0600, a écrit :
Hi, I am using the latest testing gtk mini iso image and was installing testing
and chose to install X as well as the standard system.

Isn't it exactly the question that

dpkg-reconfigure  libpam-runtime

asks?  Which choices do you get and how do you select them? Here I have

1. Unix authentication 4. Inheritable Capabilities Management
 2. GNOME Keyring Daemon - Login keyring management  5. none of the above
 3. ConsoleKit Session Management

and typing 1 2 3 4 indeed selects them all. Of course, choice 5. (none
of the above) is wrong, I'll report a bug about it.

Samuel



Reply to: