Re: Bug#717689: linux: please review and merge m68k patch
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> wrote:
>> > >> +## choice: Preemption Model
> […]
>> Now why do you want to change that?
>
> My naïve reasoning is like that: less preemption = less
> interruption / context switches = more work done in total
> at the cost of a bit interactivity (probably not all that
> much because it’s already slow).
>
> If that’s wrong I’ll remove this part too, just say so.
It doesn't matter changing these, as arch/m68k/Kconfig has:
if COLDFIRE
source "kernel/Kconfig.preempt"
endif
so none of these symbols should be in your .config file?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: