On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 12:06 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On 24-07-13 04:10, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>>> +CONFIG_NFS_SWAP=y > > > > Really? > > It _should_ be safe since the PF_MEMALLOC patches were accepted > (3.6-rc1, commit 7f338fe4540b and friends). Haven't tested it myself > yet, though. > > (and yes, I would say that swap over NBD will produce less overhead and > is therefore a better idea ;-) Yes, but why should this be m68k-specific? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part