[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SEGV (was Re: Internal compiler error on m68k for gcc-4.6)

Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:

> Well, gcc-4.3 just built fine with that amount of RAM. Anyway, there's no
> possibility to extend that. All Amigas are maxed out at 128M. In the past that
> was never an issue.

Well, in the past, we didn’t have aggressively broken/over-optimising
compilers and standards that legalise that, TLS, etc. and the software
was much smaller as well.

> I built much larger packages that came near to 1 GB of swap usage

In that case, ok. It would still exercise the memory more than before.

> As I said: we need to reduce the number of packages. ;-)

I don’t think that’s the solution. But we’ve disagreed on that
often enough. I’d like less planning, more builds ;)

(The GCC ICE/SEGV may be unrelated to the schroot error.)

Darwinism never[…]applied to wizardkind. There's a more than fair amount of[…]
stupidity in its gene-pool[…]never eradicated[…]magic evens the odds that way.
It's[…]harder to die for us than[…]muggles[…]wonder if, as technology[…]better
[…]same will[…]happen there too. Dursleys' continued existence indicates so.

Reply to: