Re: New to list
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:12:31PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > That explains why the patch below never worked on my Q950. I never
> > sent the patch because I figured there was something, well, fixable.
> > It works on CUDA. I think I tested Mac II ADB too, but I don't
> > remember the results.
> Yes, that patch would cause a Q900 or Q950 to crash on RTC/PRAM access,
> just like the 2.2 kernel did. It should work fine on any PMU, CUDA, or
> EGRET based systems. It will most likely work on all the traditional VIA
> bit-banging access systems, too. That code is pretty simple. If you do
> commit this, it's probably better to also add an exception for the Q900
> and Q950 in the code so it doesn't crash.
I don't get a crash on the Q950, but I'll do some more testing before I
send a patch. For one thing, the write code (systohc) is commented out
even though that works on CUDA too.