[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Sun, 13 May 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I would guess it should not be built at all for m68k - what m68k driver
> > requires aic7xxx? (BTW: the aic drivers are buggy as hell - we could not
> > get a U320 driver work in U320 mode at all. Got an LSI one and
> > everything's fine)
> > 
> > I'd just not build aic7xxx at all.
> I actually agree that we should not be building this driver. However,
> if there is anyone trying to fix CONFIG_HADES this header will probably
> need to be fixed before many of the drivers for PCI devices can work.
> Is anyone even trying to get that support working? It looks like the
> hades-pci code is unfinished.

It's the aic7xxx_old driver, which is there to drive all old garbage
(AFAIK ;-). Hopefully the new aic7xxx is better, _iff_ we ever get Hades
PCI support again (or how-are-they-called-again Amiga PCI bridges? :-).



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

Reply to: