Re:

[Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>]

> > Uh, messy. I'll try t make time for that.
>
> I don't think we will have 2.6.20 for m68k, unless somebody else jumps in.
> I committed 2.6.21 patches to the debian svn yesterday, all but one
> (633-atari_scc.diff m68k) apply fine to the debian source, but building
> fails due to a missing Module.symvers. This might be the same reason why I
> never got anything after 2.6.18 to build. Unfortunately I was not able to

Odd - I'll dig around in my mailbox. I never built versioned modules,
maybe that carried over into your .config?

> find out more than that this is an old problem (nearly a year for one user)
> and that I should drop kernel-package. How I build a linux-image without
> kernel-package, I haven't figured out yet... maybe the version from unstable
> will do, if not, I need somebody to decrypt the two word answers from some
> members of the kernel team for me.

I'll try. Geert started patch-bombing Linus and Andrew, so I'll have to
fix some of my patches RSN. Forward the mystic answers, I'll try to
decrypt.

	Michael