Re: Change in package architectures list.
Michael Schmitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Depending on the access pattern, a ratio of 2:1 swap to ram would be
> painful. The only machine where I could try that right away only has
> 256 MB RAM... and it's building gcc-snapshot right now.
I don't really know how much RAM might be required for a reasonable
gcc build time. I only know a bit about the VM size.
> I'll give it a shot on the 512 MB box as soon as we're largely clear
> of the backlog.
Before you can try that I'll have to generate a new source package,
one that includes pre-generated C for arm. Do you have any idea how
long it might be before you would be able to try the build?
Jeroen (and anyone else): The upstream would really like to see the
newer version in etch. I don't know if that's still a possiblity,
but if it is, what would be the best way to proceed?
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4