On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:45:04PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: > > The reason we keep all architectures in sync is so that you end > > up running the same thing if you install "Debian" on any supported > > architecture. Otherwise you'd install "Debian" on i386 and have the > > latest features, but install "Debian" on alpha and have an older version > > of some packages with fewer features and different bugs that need to be > > worked around. > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"? It won't be "Debian etch" or "Debian stable", if it's different to etch/stable on other architectures. There's no reason it can't be on debian.org servers etc, and be called "Debian for m68k" or whatever, and be available on Debian mirrors and such. I think we're just splitting hairs at this point though :) Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature