Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's
> > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"?
>
> It won't be "Debian etch" or "Debian stable", if it's different to
> etch/stable on other architectures.
That wasn't my question, what if's _not_ different?
bye, Roman
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>