New kernel compile errors
Visit:
http://welcome.to/Webbench or http://webbench.amiga.tm
-----------------------------------------
Yello
I have applayed the debian kernel patch, and I don't get the same
errors as before the patch:
sched.c:109: warning: alignment of `aligned_data' is greater than maximum object file alignment
rd.c: In function `rd_load_image':
rd.c:521: warning: int format, long int arg (arg 3)
virgefb.c:1001: warning: #warning FIXME: We should reinit the graphics engine here
process.c:50: warning: alignment of `init_task_union' is greater than maximum object file alignment
bindec.S: Assembler messages:
bindec.S:487: Error: Value of -512 too large for field of 1 bytes at 511
make[1]: *** [bindec.o] Error 1
make: *** [_dir_arch/m68k/fpsp040] Error 2
Now I get this:
sched.c:109: warning: alignment of `aligned_data' is greater than maximum object file alignment
virgefb.c:1001: warning: #warning FIXME: We should reinit the graphics engine here
bigphysarea.c:55: warning: `big_lock' defined but not used
process.c:50: warning: alignment of `init_task_union' is greater than maximum object file alignment
arch/m68k/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xd0): undefined reference to `register_serial'
arch/m68k/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xd8): undefined reference to `unregister_serial'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
I have no programming skills, and the only reason I'm trying to
compile a new kernel, is that I what the most from my small system....
I have tryed a 2.0.36, a 2.1.124 and right now I'm trying a 2.2.10,
all have failed to compile....
Mayby there is a kind person out there, who can spare some CPU time
and compile a kernel from my .config ?
--
Kind regards
Henrik Th. Farre
------------
Amiga4000 - 040 - 16MB - CyberVision64/3D - Eizo F56 17" Monitor
3.2GB Quantum Fireball - 56.6 kbs modem
AmigaOS 3.1 - MacOS 7.6.1 - Linux 2.2
---------------------------------------------------
Contact:
homepage : http://welcome.to/Webbench -- http://webbench.amiga.tm
e-mail : enrique@superbruger.dk -- webbench@denmark.crosswinds.net
Reply to: