[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-video] One proposal about debconf16 videos



On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:07:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I don't mind.
> 
> However, the easiest way is probably to hack up things so that
> generating a webm file creates a low-res version by default, and then
> setting everything back to "encode" again.
> 
> This makes it impossible (or, well, at least "much harder") to fix any
> issues with already-encoded files. I'll therefore postpone this until
> next week or so, so that I'm 100% sure that everything's been dealt
> with.
> 
> (also, the encoder was brought down now, so in order to this I'll have
> to recreate its environment on vittoria now. That's not hard, I can do
> it, but it's a bit of work...)

So I've done the above, and generated a low-res version of one talk as a
test, which you can find at 
<https://veyepar.debian.org/static/veyepar/debian/debconf16/webm/The_Electronic_Struggle.webm>

The resolution was forced to 360x288, which is half the resolution (in
both directions, so a quarter of) pal-DV at 720x576. The resulting file
is 155M in size, versus 527MB of the full-quality version.

Before I start to do low-res encodes of all the talks, I would welcome
some comments. If there's a possible improvement to be made, now's the
time to speak up.

(VP9 is not a possibility, since the libvpx in stable doesn't support it
yet...)

Regards,

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12

Reply to: