Re: Budget to Bursaries and Invited Speakers
Paulo Henrique Santana dijo [Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:35:28PM -0300]:
> > I am not certain whether I will have the time to continue being the
> > Content Team lead (am still willing to, but I'll have to decide closer
> > to the beginning of 2019). But my opinion, which seems to be shared by
> > the team, is that it is not _required_.
> By the way, who is the content team today?
AFAICT, the firstname.lastname@example.org alias currently reaches:
- Ana Guerrero <email@example.com>
- Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Gunnar Wolf <email@example.com>
- Jonathan Bustillos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Martin Zobel-Helas <email@example.com>
- Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Nicolas Braud-Santoni <email@example.com>
- Rafael Rivas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Santiago Ruano <email@example.com>
- Tássia Camões <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Znoteer <email@example.com>
Not all of them were active in the role for DC18.
> > Sometimes it's important to
> > have specific people invited to tackle from an outsiders' perspective
> > specific issues we face, and I guess we *might* invite _somebody_, but
> > I cannot justify earmarking US$5000 for this.
> I hope that this change does not happen in our round because it can
> be very useful to Open Day.
Content team does not organize the Open Day. Specific budget can be
given to Open Day if you think this is needed; making this budget be
for invited speakers (and thus handled via Content) falls in the same
situation that David described that happened WRT invited speakers and
bursaries - One team required another one to approve things regarding
its "inner" affairs.