[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Budget approval based on ledger



also sprach Martín Ferrari <tincho@tincho.org> [2015-05-29 05:20 +0200]:
> I have to say I have never used ledger before (and I've been meaning to
> start keeping my books with it, but ENOTIME), so I don't really
> understand all the details you explain here...
> 
> A priori, I think that a text-based ledger, kept in a VCS where one can
> track changes, is a great improvement for handling the budget, for all
> parties involved. Now, my only fear would be if this is too complicated
> or difficult to learn for most people (I honestly don't know)..

Please have a look at http://slexy.org/view/s2Z5PoPNeY, the budget
file, to which I just appended the travel budget extension Tassia
approved. I'd say this is readable even without ledger knowledge,
don't you think?

To get a current snapshot of the budget, please update
debconf-team.git/dc15/accounting and run

  ./wrapper bal budget

Usable? If you think so, you could ack the budget:fees:registration
extension by 100 €, which was a stupid oversight on my behalf. We
had already spent more on the Verein registration than in the budget
when I originally set it up. Silly mistake. Please approve the fix
;)

Btw, the booking for budget:fees:registration is marked with a '!'
instead of a '*', which has no meaning to ledger but which we can
use to track approvals.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  DebConf orga team
`. `'`
  `-  DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
      DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Reply to: