also sprach Patty Langasek <harmoney@dodds.net> [2014-09-21 19:29 +0200]:
> In which case, you consider DebCamp "free time", which brings us full circle
> back to a debate I know you don't want to go anywhere near. Trust me. Please
> call it "hacking time", despite what you prefer to call it.
I disagree. DebCamp is DebCamp, and we should restrict it to people
trying to get work done.
DebConf14 had free slots you guys called hacking time. I know plenty
people who did not hack then, and it was not expected, was it?
> The experiment of combining hack time with conference time was
> intended to address this issue. We were fortunate enough to be
> able to incorporate a few extra days (capping weekends) due to the
> timing in the US to help balance it a little so we could fine-tune
> going forward. I'd be very disappointed to see the experiment go
> to waste.
Noone is suggesting that. If you read our proposal, you will see
that it adopts the idea. I just don't think we should call it
hacking time when people are free to do whatever they want…
including hacking!
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)