also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez <ana@debian.org> [2014-06-25 17:42 +0200]: > We have so far no submission of a DPL talk. Why this one has to be > the talk after the opening talk :? Are you going to work also > on scheduling? I'd rather not volunteer right now. My task was to create time slots and structure the days, and I am done with that. I will now remove the DPL talk and make it a normal talk slot. > Are we going to have talks after dinner? this wasn't in vorlon's > schedule. People should have some free time. Don't schedule any talks in those then! ;) My mandate was that there ought to be hack/free time and that time must not clash with any events, so once I had the hack/free time slotted, I made everything else potential talks slots. > We were using "talk slot" differently, for you are talks "gaps" in the > timetable where we have talks and for me where the number of talks/bof > events we can have. Sure, but I think that the number of concurrent talks in a single time slot should depend on the talk(s). For instance, closing and opening ceremonies should be exclusive. Probably the DPL talk and the DC15/DC16 events too. Most regular talks should not require exclusivity. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)