On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:21:48PM -0800, Gerald Turner wrote: > Briana de Jong <briana@puppetlabs.com> writes: > > I did some thinking last night and I think that if we bought small > > taster cups only, then we can get around the catering issue and allow > > people to pour their own. OLCC is pretty strict and when you have > > over 200 people at an event, the rules change and servers are > > necessary. It is basically a liability issue because if anyone leaves > > drunk and gets in an accident, it would be Puppet Labs responsibility > > because we are hosting the space. The laws are crazy, but for a > > reason. We also have to get special insurance for an event like this. > > This is basically why we were offering to host the whole party because > > of these laws and we know how to fit within the guidelines. IMHO that sounds like the way forward. I didn't know about the 200 person limit; that makes sense for why there was conflicting information floating around regarding the requirements. > > I am not sure how you got to do this in NYC either :) Maybe no one > > checked the rules first and just did it. I think in NYC they didn't care because there was zero risk of anyone driving home from the party ;P (And that's not much different in this case, either!) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature