Hi Gaudenz, On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:40:37PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Raphaël Walther <raphael.walther@gmail.com> writes: > > I have added all the infomation I could to (this is a draft plan): > > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/DayTrip > > > > One first thing is that Mauler (activity A) has a already another group in the > > morning. So either cancel it or do it in the afternoon. I don't know what is > > the solution here. > > What happened to the visit to the watch museum you proposed in your > first mail? If mauler is already booked I'd skip that and instead offer > the museum. Mauler is also somewhat similar to the absinthe distillery. I have dropped it. I will put it back on the wiki and dropped Mauler. More about the museum on the wiki later. > For the afternoon I have an alternative proposal: > > IMO we should really include the buskers festival[1] into the Daytrip > program. Yes++ > Instead of taking the boat we could have 3-4 buses back from Neuchatel > to Vaumarcus at different times: 17:00, 19:00, 21:00 (to be defined > exactly). People wanting to stay even longer, can also return by public > transport (takes longer but is very well possible). I like your idea but we need to find a solution to alocate people to the different coaches. Otherwise we will have for example an empty coach at 17:00 because everyone would be at Buskers (or a full one because it is raining). > As the boat trip is also very nice, we could do this in the morning and > only take the buses from Neuchatel if we don't want to skip it. On the > other hand, those interested can also just take the public boat to > Yverdon on another day. I think we should forget the boat even if it is very nice it is quite expensive as well and it doesn't fit really in the new program we are drafting. > For dinner I'd then propose that we have dinner from 19:00 to 21:00 at > Le Camp, so that those returning with one of the first two buses can eat > at Le Camp. The others would have to take care of their own food. We > would have to talk to Le Camp if that's possible and if we could > announce the numbers only 2-3 days in advance as an exception for this > evening. An alternative is to offer another cold meal that can be packed > already in the morning for dinner, so that everything stays more flexible. Yeah, we need to know who will eat at Le Camp and who will eat in Neuchâtel. > I'm not sure if this is overall a better option than what you propose. > But I'd like to put it up for discussion. Thanks for sharing. I think it is. Cheers, Raphaël
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature