Re: Video Team really NEEDS diff's from the original schedule - was Re: Debian Project goals for 2005-2006
[Please, don't Cc: me. I don't need extra copies of list mail.]
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Henning Sprang wrote:
> as nobody answered the appended message until now, I feel forced to really
> emphasize :
>
> It is really crucial for me to get informed about the changes in the
> talk schedule, plus it would be really cool to get some machine
> readable format of it (while the latter could replace the former,
> bugt my requests for this keep unanswered, too)
To repeat again what I've said in
<[🔎] 20050710175221.GP29146@xieana.donarmstrong.org> and
<[🔎] 20050710202149.GU29146@xieana.donarmstrong.org>
No changes have been made.
There was a typo in the room assignment for the Debian Women's
talk. It is going to be held in T1, was scheduled to be held in T1,
but a typo in the printed schedule (which has since been rectivied)
had it listed in T2.
A machine readable format which includes BoFs and lunch and dinner as
well is at http://archimedes.ucr.edu/schedule.txt. If you need a
parser for it, e-mail me and I will send it to you.
Don Armstrong
--
Dropping non-free would set us back at least, what, 300 packages? It'd
take MONTHS to make up the difference, and meanwhile Debian users will
be fleeing to SLACKWARE.
And what about SHAREHOLDER VALUE?
-- Matt Zimmerman in <gYuD3D.A.ayC.nGB39@murphy>
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to debconf5-team-unsubscribe@lists.debconf.org.
Reply to: