Hey, On Sunday 11 June 2006 09:35, Steve Langasek wrote: > I didn't make any assumptions here, it was Holger who posted suggesting > that one of the differences between talks and presentations for next year > might be sponsorship. (I assumed that he meant *prioritization* of > sponsorship, though he didn't say.) I think so. (I was not part of the sponsorship team, so I can only guess from what I heard. And when we talked on irc about those four types, we only talked about "sponsorship" not about "prioritization of sponsorship" though this could be, what stockholm, for the sponsorship-team, had in mind. (It was a discussion on irc, where abbreviations are used frequently.) I probably wouldnt write this mail now, if I hadnt had a new idea to bring this discussion forward, so hear it is: for next year we should come up with a list of things, that are required for sponsorship and another which tells, what increases the chances to get sponsorship (involvement in debian, giving a talk, paying 10% of the sum, whatever). This will also help to make the decision, who get's sponsorship easier and more objective, (besides saving the sponsorship team from accusations...) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpVNAIA1Gbww.pgp
Description: PGP signature