Hi, Buddha Buck: > > I'd prefer [2b], with a mandatory "do nothing" option on the ballot. That > > way, people can indicate whether further discussion or something else > > (or nothing at all) should take place, should the supermajority option > > fail. > > Except in the case of an election, there should always be a "reject all > options" choice on the ballot. In an election, that choice should probably be "I'd rather abolish this office than elect any of _those_ goons". (Supermajority required. ;-) > [ ] ACCEPT resolution declaring Buddha Buck a forbidden interloper > [ ] REJECT resolution declaring Buddha Buck a forbidden interloper > [ ] FURTHER DISCUSSION > > It makes no sense to have no way to reject a proposal or an amendment. I assume that the "further discussion" item is/should be the default option..? -- Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
Attachment:
pgp0r_eg2Yw1c.pgp
Description: PGP signature