Re: voting mechanics draft update
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:11:30AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > It is not possible for to express a lack of preference among multiple
> > > options simultaneously with a preference for any of those multiple
> > > options over another option?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:39:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > [ 1 ] Foo
> > [ 2 ] Bar
> > [ 2 ] Baz
> > [ 3 ] Quux
> >
> > should work fine with the voting software as it stands; I don't know
> > that anyone cares enough to make it officially supported.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, I actually think we should. It's nice to have this expressiveness
> and I think we should mandate its preservation.
Does anybody have any reason to not want this?
I'm going to be busy tomorrow, but if nobody has any significant
objections, I'll write this into the draft on Thursday.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: